Silence of the Damned

With so much protests going on about us, why is there relative silence about the suppression of free speech? Such silence will surely damn America like a cancer causing the destruction of our cultural and social values. As Mark Twain said “The truth hurts but silence kills.”

What is it about Edward Snowden that scares the NSA so much?  After all, what he released seven years ago is already in the public domain, and much of it disclosed what should be deemed illegal activities by that organization to begin with.  He was a true whistle blower, and the American people should embrace him as a hero, not a traitor. His actions were a protest against our government’s obscene surveillance and invasions of privacy of Americans. I think exposing that scares those that are up to no good.

Amazingly Trump is considering pardoning Snowden.  That is likely motivation due to his feud with the intelligence community regarding his dealings with Russia and the Ukraine, but you take whatever good comes along and pardoning Snowden would be a good thing.

Snowden had supporters in Congress, such as Ron Paul, who stated “My understanding is that espionage means giving secret or classified information to the enemy.  Since Snowden shared information with the American people, his indictment for espionage could reveal, or confirm, that the US Government views you and me as the enemy.” That’s a chilling insight we need to seriously consider.

Snowden was charged under, among other statutes, the Espionage Act of 1917.  That was a shameful law that was meant to silence protest about the US entry into the Great War; the most shameful episode was the acquiescence of the Supreme Court in Schenck v. United States. Schenck was protesting through the distribution of pamphlets, the same publication medium as Thomas Paine’s Common Sense during the American Revolution. The Courts twisted logic in finding against Schenck was a repudiation of free speech if there ever was one. We currently face a tsunami of forces against free speech.

Politically we face the likely revision to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Oddly enough the original purpose of that legislation was to restrict free speech on the internet that was deemed “obscene”, but it also included this section which protected social media as an open public platform against law suits about what someone may publish that anyone found offensive. Now both Democrats and Republicans want to change that as they seek to silence free voices that may criticize them.

Academically there’s the very troubling phenomenon on college campuses where opinions expressed by students and faculty that fellow students and teachers find offensive often results in censorship, suspension, firing and expulsion. How can institutions of higher learning not support free expression, the very essence of intellectual development?

Socially, we are not doing much better.  Consider for a moment the Antifa movement, which openly espouses that the very concept of free speech is a tool of “liberal” suppression.  The term liberal here does not refer to a political spectrum of modern politics but that of the Enlightenment. That the acronym Antifa stands for Anti-Fascism is another Bizzaro World reversal of our times. Also be aware of the “woke” movement which seeks to suppress any free expression that someone finds “threatening”; well there’s a slippery slope that can’t lead to anything good.

The mass media has not been very helpful here; they are supposed to represent an essential element of democracy as a free press but in fact have deteriorated into political advocacy contrary to objective journalism. This failure aids in polarization and provides an open door for interference from bad actors like Russian and Chinese agents. The effectiveness of those actions increases in the absence of reliable information.  

Soon we will see political debates as a lead up to the 2020 elections. It’s troubling that both major parties are actively working to prevent the inclusion of third party candidates, even initiating law suits in that effort. This is not an encouraging development in support of free speech. Americans have a right to hear from all those seeking public office and a true democratic process requires an informed electorate.

Regardless of your political position, keep in mind that free of speech is the foundation of liberty which provides you with the right to even have a political position.  A lack of support for free speech is a silence that will damn that right to an empty phrase.


Author: jvi7350

Politically I am an independent. While I tend to avoid labels, I consider myself a Libertarian. I find our politics to have deteriorated to a current state of ranting tribialism, and a growing disregard for individual rights; based on the axiom that silence is consent, I choose instead to speak out and therefore launched this blog.

9 thoughts on “Silence of the Damned”

  1. As usual, Trump is saying something without having a clue.

    “”I’m going to look at it,” Trump said. “I’m not that aware of the Snowden situation, but I’m going to start looking at it.””

    But being unaware of the “Snowden situation” didn’t stop him from saying this in July of 2013 “I think Snowden is a terrible threat, I think he’s a terrible traitor, and you know what we used to do in the good old days when we were a strong country — you know what we used to do to traitors, right?” That was taken to mean execute him.

    Quite the 180° turn.


    1. I recall all that, all valid points. Like I said, his motivation was his feud with intelligence agencies, nothing principled.


  2. If you are really concerned about a loss of free speech in this country, as I am, I have a harsh reality for you. Being a libertarian is a way to throw away your vote. If you are really troubled by the loss of free speech you MUST vote for Trump. the democrats have embraced an Orwellian future where only right-speak can be uttered…otherwise you are immediately labeled a racist or a deplorable. They also support (by their lack of action and admonishment) the fascists who are violent destructive, and ruining our cities. Vote #trump2020.


    1. I respect and value your point of view, but note that Michelle Obama had the same message in support of Biden. I choose to vote for a candidate that I respect, even if they can’t win, because in the long run those that do will help free speech more than either major party. In the 2016 election 19.8% of eligible voters went for Clinton, 19.5% for Trump and 2.2% for others, i.e. that’s only 41.5% of eligible voters. That means that 58.5% didn’t vote, a sad reflection but indicative of the apathy that the two main political parties engender in Americans. The mass media doesn’t help here as they reported percentages of VAP (Voting Age Population), about 14% of which were ineligible voters. I would like to see more about how such a significant percentage were ineligible. Regardless, per the mass media, 55.6% of VAP voted, 46.1% of which went for Trump and 48.2% for Clinton, and about 5.7% other; that was the fifth time that a President won the electoral vote but not the popular. This may happen again in 2020, but I think more people will vote this time, and I think it will be close, which is why both major parties are fighting hard to deprive Americans of a meaningful debate by suing for exclusion of any third party, a shameful suppression of free speech when we need it the most.


      1. I hadn’t initially caught Joel’s response, so thanks for the alert. My response to his comment can also serve as a response to your comment.


      1. Trump’s election was a result of a nation polarized by a long history of constitutional erosion, cultural right think of collective groupies and a growing disregard for individual liberties. My true hope is that the two major parties disintegrate into the various conflicting elements within them exposing to the American people the need to think for and define themselves as individuals and not feel compelled to identify with the mindless cliques that are rising out of these moribund political machines.


    2. I don’t agree that voting my conscience can ever be considered wasting my vote. My conscience refuses to accept the lesser of two evils, especially when I have a choice to vote for someone and something good, which I do not consider either of the two major parties being. As far as which party embraces a right think position, I find both Democrats and Republicans guilty of that. I agree that the Democrats have taken a very dangerous position regarding the arson and vandalism that has occured, but I also think that the Republicans are overplaying their hand; statistically 93% of the protests were devoid of violence, so while 7% is still a riot, the vast majority were not. If the two major parties are incapable of presenting more intelligent, honest and meaningful platforms than the race card, law and order, Covid competence and helicopter money, then they do not deserve our votes.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create your website with
Get started
%d bloggers like this: