What Bubble?

While we suffer through the current pain of the trade war, the Fed interest rate manipulations, ever earlier campaign hysterics, threats of recession, and all other maddening modern phenomenon, there is seemingly an odd confidence that the American economy is still doing just fine because there is no apparent bubble like there was in 2008.

There has been some news regarding the irrational behavior of the world’s central banks with $16T of sovereign debt trading with negative interest rates, and the equally irrational behavior regarding the federal debt and deficit situation; but we hear little about the same issue in the private sector.  Why is that? Let’s look at some simple statistics published by the Federal Reserve:

  1. Corporate High Yield Bonds, also known as Junk Bonds for their high risk, have been increasing in defaults, somewhere around $35B this year alone.  That means that there are companies out there that are considered Zombies, i.e. with earnings less than their debt service, who have simply found they are now incapable of continuing to pay their debts.
  2. Earlier this year, defaults on auto loans were up nearly 5% year-over-year; this is about the same it was in 2009.
  3. Mortgage debt exceeded $9T last quarter, more than the record breaker in 2009.
  4. Student loan defaults are skyrocketing.

So why does the Fed and politicians tell us that there are no bubbles to indicate concerns that we would have a crash.  One hypothesis is that governments are not prone to call a debt crisis a bubble, such as the Dot.Com bubble of 2000 or Housing Bubble of 2008, because to do so would make it apparent that it can be directly tracked to artificially depressed interest rates.

We are told that we need to be more accommodating to maintain a healthy economy, as has the ECB done in Europe.  Well if that were so, why then are they in recession given that interest rates are so “accommodating” that they went negative? The fact the Germany could only sell less than half its recent bond offering, and that in the US the Fed’s quarter point reduction caused an inversion and bond panic should be a warning that debt markets are in crisis.

If we have a healthy economy as we are being told, why the need for stimulus, or why do we have a record deficit when historically deficits decline in a healthy economy? Why are these policies focused on getting the consumer to spend when it is known that consumption is not actually growth?   

If the Federal Reserve and the Federal government were interested in true and long term growth, it would do whatever it can to increase savings which creates capital needed for investing.  This is such an obvious concept to grasp that you have to wonder why the Fed does not promote it as a policy.  A society that emphasizes differed consumption in order to secure a more financially secure state for future generations creates long term sustainability.  Clearly, this is no longer the case in America and is not a sustainable economic condition as savings are at a record low. The absence of yield created by a policy to manipulatimg interest rates lower is meant to encourage consumption over savings, and is unsustainable. wObj�V=��*

#WHATBUBBLE

Author: jvi7350

Politically I am an independent. While I tend to avoid labels, I consider myself a Libertarian. I find our politics to have deteriorated to a current state of ranting tribialism, and a growing disregard for individual rights; based on the axiom that silence is consent, I choose instead to speak out and therefore launched this blog.

2 thoughts on “What Bubble?”

  1. “If the Federal Reserve and the Federal government were
    interested in true and long term growth, it would do whatever it can to increase savings which creates capital needed for investing.”

    What would that be? And does the fact that a large portion of our society lives pay check to paycheck make that somewhat difficult. And why aren’t our major companies investing the 10 of billions of dollars saved in 2018 due to tax reform in infrastructure and research, versus buying back stock and paying their major employees larger salaries? 60 of the largest corporations in America paid no income tax in 2018, with the result, with increase spending, that the debt is now over a trillion dollars.

    Like

    1. The first thing would be for the Fed to stop inflating the money supply and depressing interest rates as that drastically depreciates buying power disabling the ability or incentive to save, and it provides the source for cheap stock buy-backs by getting the initial flow of the new money at artificially low costs to where that happens. The second thing is to kill the cronyism that infects the tax laws you are referring to where the middle class does the heavy lifting, so we can agree on that point. However that point is also often overplayed. For instance, Amazon is a favorite target on that score among many candidates who fail to understand that until 2018, Amazon had never made a profit! It’s stock is strong because Bezos puts profits back into the company to be exactly what it’s becoming. It’s called investing in plant and people – real growth, real jobs. The third thing is for the Federal government to stop spending from an empty pocket, relying on what they think is endless debt. That eats away at real GMP dislocating production in favor of consumption, an environment toxic to savings. The fourth thing is true tax reform where everyone pays less, and that starts with cutting the size of this wasteful Leviathan of a welfare/warfare state.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create your website with WordPress.com
Get started
%d bloggers like this: